new yorker by birth, londoner by choice. conceptual art director. lover of words: their meanings and letter forms. no coffee, fizzy drinks or cigarettes.
70 percent of consumers prefer getting to know a company via content marketing such as sponsored articles rather than ads, but brands spend more on advertising than on this type of content. (Content Plus)http://www.digiday.com/brands/15-alarming-facts-about-brands-2/
no noise products available at selfridges, your favourite brands without the branding
former US Presidents get a hipster-fied visual identity
the color ‘PANTONE 2685C’ or as it’s more popularly known, purple, has been trademarked by cadbury after a court found in their favor against rival nestle.
the brand bible - norwich cathedral’s gorgeous new brand guidelines
most popular colours in logos (by industry): a handy chart
this student re-imagining of the microsoft logo looks cleaner, fresher and more modern than the current redesign
“Design studio ‘And’ created this beautiful vintage inspired brand identity. Re-Cycles is a business for bicycle restorations and repairs based in Melbourne.”
1) the death of no - to stay happy we must stay open to new experiences. brands must be open to new ideas and embrace ‘yes’ culture
2) the death of consistancy - consistancy is dull, predictable, repetitive and one-dimensional. consistancy is not inspirational! no one ever fell in love because they though ‘she’s really consistant’. coherance is the death of f**cking guidelines and the birth of branded creative.
3) death of logos - logos are not inspiring anyone anymore; stop doing them. they are a one-way street where conversations are banned. logos are disliked by the public and hated by the press. it’s time we thought about other things to design for brands than these awful things. unlike confusing new logos which need a manual and an explination, brand worlds are living, layered, curated ways of hooking everything up. they describe brands in a useful connected way and they are ACTUALLY interesting. unlike a logo in the bottom right-hand corner of an ad.
4) the death of reach - marketing is always telling us how many people their ads reach, but is reaching people enough in a time where conversation sharing and comment is required? reaching for people doesn’t mean connecting with people at all. Traditional branding might reach for the millions but how many people does it actually touch? Branding that interacts in a meaningful way connects more deeply, and brings about change.
5. the death of ‘digital’ - saying it’s ‘digital’ is dumb. brands can’t choose to be digital now, they just are. and if you blindly try to be ‘digital’ you end up creating a very expensive fart. it makes an impact but everyone things you’re a dick. to be digital is to be connected. ideas are not a child to nurture, no one likes other people’s kids. ideas are tarrantulas, consider all the connections and everything makes a long lasting impression. forget that and everything gets into trouble very fast as ‘GAP-gate’ showed us.
then make the results beautiful, because beauty is always inspirational.
simon manchipp, someone @ D&AD PechaKucha lecture
the hot topic on everyone’s lips (and fingertips) is the rebranding of AOL to Aol. where to start really, with the new mixed caps/lower case it reads like the kid in the tootise pop commercial pronouncing ‘owl’ (ref) and the knocked out type is a nice idea however executed poorly, and the background images look as if someone went mad with istock credits. i could go on, but will spare you. what are your thoughts on the aol rebrand?